• HOME
  • LIVE FEED
  • ARTICLES
  • Syria
  • PODCASTS
  • ABOUT
  • OUR TEAM
  • CONTACT
Menu

  • HOME
  • LIVE FEED
  • ARTICLES
  • Syria
  • PODCASTS
  • ABOUT
  • OUR TEAM
  • CONTACT
Chinese-ship.jpg

China’s Crash Complicates Its Peaceful Rise

August 25, 2015

Over the last month the Chinese stock market has seen massive day-on-day falls representing a loss of billions of dollars of value, and the rapid deflation of certain sectors of its economy. This combined with a number of other factors could give rise to a dynamic where the country may need to become more belligerent in order to maintain internal order. The crash of China’s stock market is just one of several factors which belie serious concerns for the country’s future economic growth. While the market itself does not have strong links with China’s ‘real economy’, there is mounting evidence that China is slowing down at a faster rate than its leadership can control. Among the most damning evidence of this is a recent index showing manufacturing at its lowest levels since the Global Financial Crisis. Furthermore, recent reports from China’s provinces show massive levels of debt, slowing growth and a significant over-reliance on the so-called ‘shadow banking’ sector.

Barring a dramatic collapse of the Chinese economy, which at this stage still seems improbable, it is likely that Chinese growth will continue to contract. The country’s government is already preparing for this, with a the promotion of the ‘New Normal’ (新常态) – a transition to a lower-growth, consumption-based economy. While this rebranding effort might appease some, it shows just how concerned the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is with the perceived failure of its economic mandate.

Fundamental to the modern CCP is the concept of the Harmonious Society ( 和谐社会), an idea which enshrines stability as the core goal of the government. Effectively every action the CCP takes, from its internet censorship to its aggressive market interventions, is undertaken with this in mind. Should large numbers of Chinese people lose their manufacturing jobs, or their savings through a property/stock market crash, this would cause massive internal instability.

Within this dynamic, alongside an internal crackdown, the Chinese government would likely eye moves which could unite the country through nationalism. Among the most alarming of these are possible aggressive moves in the South China Sea, and the Diaoyu Islands. These could involve provoking neighbors like Japan and Vietnam into a small-scale skirmish to distract from internal unrest. Other less likely locations for such posturing would be the Indian border in the Kashmir region, an area home to recent Sino/Indian disputes, and the Chinese border with Myanmar, scene of a deadly cross border incident earlier this year.

The goal of any such provocations would not be to conquer territory or indeed even to gain international diplomatic capital, but rather simply to bolster internal stability against a foreign threat. Despite this, there is a very clear escalation risk that comes with such moves. Accordingly, the Chinese economy would have to be in a significantly poorer state than it is now, before the CCP would be willing to risk such a step.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r6msOg-d78

Nevertheless, the risks of Chinese “aggression” in key areas will continue to rise for as long as the Chinese economy continues to sink. Surrounding nations would do well to better understand Chinese actions, and either beef up defenses in potential flashpoints, or indeed play for an appeasement strategy which accommodates possible aggression from China that doesn’t pose a real threat to their core territories.

China has long stated that its economic rise was a peaceful one, but with its economy no longer rising so fast, will its promise of peace also disappear?

In General Tags China, Economy, India, Japan, Markets, Myanmar, South China Sea, Vietnam
UA-Tank2.jpg

A Prime Time For Provocations In Ukraine

December 26, 2014

The 26th Of December 2014 marks the 23rd anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union. This event, which the current Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed was the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 21st century”, also marked the birth of new independent Ukrainian state. In the 22 years since then, the Russian Federation has made concerted efforts to keep Ukraine within its sphere of influence. However, the last year has seen a major defeat for Russia in this respect. While it has annexed Crimea, and installed a puppet regime in parts of eastern Donbass, it has lost the rest of Ukraine, and taken hundreds (if not thousands) of casualties in doing so. This geopolitical realignment of Ukraine cumulated this week with the country’s parliament (Rada) voting to remove its non-aligned status and pursue a course whereby they will eventually join NATO.